Dui License

 

DUI License
DUI License
Dui Dwi Owui
DUI History
MADD
Dui Investigation

 Dui License

The goals of the Comprehensive DUI Drivers License Vehicle Impound Program are to:

  • reduce the number of fatal/injury collisions, alcohol related fatal/injury collisions, and fatal/injury hit-and-run collisions each by 10 percent;

  • reduce nighttime (9 p.m.-3 a.m.) fatal/injury collisions by 10 percent;

  • reduce the total number of hit-and-run collisions by 10 percent;

  • increase child restraint compliance by 10 percent;

 

 
  • increase the number of impounded vehicles by 20 percent; and

  • conduct 18 Driving Under the Influence (DUI Drivers License checkpoints in two years.

 

 

STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES

Equipment, promotional flyers, and handout materials were identified and ordered prior to the beginning of checkpoint operations. Problem areas, such as violator identification were quickly appraised and solved by field fingerprinting and photographing violators. The media was notified and press coverage was initially good. Patrol deputies were exposed to a comprehensive vehicle impound training program prior to working a DUI/Driver�s License checkpoint. Checkpoint locations were selected based on recent collision and DUI frequency rates.

During checkpoints, sworn deputies were used on an overtime basis. Explorer Scouts and Reserve Deputies augmented the staff. The Sheriff�s Volunteers on Patrol (VOP) personnel assisted with Spanish language interpretation, traffic control, and transportation duties. Cameras and fingerprinting were essential in violator identification later in court. Impound fees collected as a result of the 20 checkpoint operations totaled $80,934, compared to the approximately $60,000 spent to operate the program.

Sheriff�s Station Open House events exposed thousands of visitors to traffic safety deputies and materials. A Sober Graduation presentation at a local high school just prior to graduation day impacted over 1,500 students.

 

RESULTS

  • Fatal/injury collisions were reduced from 47 to 30 (36 percent).

  • Alcohol related fatal/injury collisions were reduced from 27 to 9 (67 percent).

  • Fatal/injury hit-and-run collisions were reduced from 16 to 10 (38 percent).

  • The total number of hit-and-run collisions went from 111 to 89 (20 percent).

  • Child seat compliance increased from 67 percent to 82 percent.

  • The number of impounded vehicles increased from 403 to 808 (100 percent).

  • Eight educational presentations impacted over 9,100 people.

  • Twenty checkpoints were conducted (exceeding the goal of 18), resulting in 34 criminal arrests.

  • $80,934 in impound fees were collected.

Hit-and-run collisions accounted for over 25 percent of all collisions in La Puente, California, compared to the statewide average of only 18 percent. Sixty-five percent of the hit-and-run drivers who are apprehended are intoxicated. Over half of them are uninsured, unlicensed, or have a suspended license.

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION

The Department of Public Safety’s concern about the hazards created by motorists combining alcohol and other drugs is growing. This concern includes not only drugs of abuse such as ecstasy, cocaine, heroin, PCP, and marijuana, but also prescription medications and medications sold over the counter.

The Internet has increased access to illegal prescription drugs. Of particular concern is the use of pain relievers (Tylenol/codeine, Percodan, and Ultram), sleeping pills (Ambien, Sonata, barbiturates), or anti-anxiety medication (Valium, Ativan, Xanax, Librium, Elavil). Even common medications sold over the counter for colds, allergies or anxiety may affect a driver’s ability to operate a motor vehicle in ways so subtle that the operator may not realize that he or she is affected. The effects of these types of drugs could be exacerbated when they are taken with alcohol.

In 2000, approximately 6,000 blood and urine samples were analyzed for alcohol as a part of routine DUI (Driving Under the Influence) screening. However, only 50 percent of the samples were also analyzed for the presence of drugs. A complete drug analysis of all blood and urine specimens submitted for DUI investigation is necessary to implement a comprehensive prevention program. In order to obtain a clear, complete profile of those arrested for DUI, the presence of common prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, and drugs of abuse/controlled substances must be identified.

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

The DUI Screening project’s goal is to implement blood and urine analysis in DUI screening to create a profile of those driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol. The project’s objectives are to:

  • Identify drivers arrested for DUI who are also under the influence of drugs and properly identify the drug(s) used;
  • Conduct a demographic analysis of the resulting data and make it available to traffic safety, enforcement, and state prosecutors; and
  • Coordinate project data with the Connecticut Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) to provide a comprehensive representation of the incidence of driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs in fatal crashes.

STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES

The DUI Screening project created the following multi-step process for analyzing DUI samples for the presence of drugs:

  1. Assign a laboratory case number to each DUI sample the lab’s Evidence Control Officer receives.

  2. Analyze the sample(s) for the presence of alcohol (Ethanol, Methanol or Acetone) using Gas Chromatography (GC) via Head Space (HS) analysis.

  3. Create a duplicate test sample to comply with state alcohol testing statutes.

  4. Submit duplicate sample to the Enzyme Multiplied Immunoassay Technique (EMIT) to screen for controlled substances.

  5. Verify results. Connecticut statutes require confirmation of a positive test, therefore, positive EMIT samples (positive results) are sent to the Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy (GC/MS) for confirmation. GC/MS, a highly specific screening method, allows each individual compound in a sample to be identified, including controlled, non-controlled, legal and illegal substances.

  6. Prepare and review report after testing is complete. The laboratory retains the original report including all test results, and sends a copy to the submitting law enforcement agency and the tested subject.

  7.  Enter data from the report into the laboratory DUI Screening database.

RESULTS

As of January 2004, the DUI Screening project is close to fully operational. Approximately 1600 test results have been added into the DUI Screening database. The data added into the database will include demographics such as town or county of origin, year of birth of subject, date of incident, and screening summary. An outside consultant is currently writing queries to make the database even more usable. The data collected through this screening process will be made available to highway safety officials, state prosecutors, and DUI enforcement personnel. The data will be reviewed as highway safety plans are developed and will be used to assist in concentrated project planning efforts. By analyzing all blood, urine, and breath samples for the presence of alcohol or other drugs, the DUI Screening project is helping to provide a more comprehensive picture of the DUI issue and its offenders.

 

Drunk driving is the act of operating and/or driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs to the degree that mental and motor skills are impaired. It is illegal in all jurisdictions within the U.S. The specific criminal offense is usually called driving under the influence [of alcohol and/or other drugs] (DUI), and in some states driving while intoxicated (DWI), operating while impaired (OWI), or operating a vehicle under the influence (OVI). Such laws may also apply to boating or piloting aircraft.

In the United States the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that 17,941 people died in 2006 in "alcohol-related" collisions, representing 41 percent of total traffic deaths in the US. Over 500,000 people were injured in alcohol-related accidents in the US in 2003. NHTSA defines fatal collisions as "alcohol-related" if they believe the driver, a passenger, or a nonoccupant of the vehicle (such as a pedestrian or pedalcyclist) had a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.01 or greater. NHTSA defines nonfatal collisions as "alcohol-related" if the accident report indicates evidence of alcohol present. NHTSA specifically notes that "alcohol-related" does not necessarily mean a driver or nonoccupant was tested for alcohol and that the term does not indicate a collision or fatality was caused by the presence of alcohol.[1] On average, about 60 percent of the BAC values are missing or unknown. To analyze what they believe is the complete data, statisticians simulate BAC information.[2]
Contents



All states in the U.S. designate a per se blood or breath alcohol level as the threshold point for an independent criminal offense. A second criminal offense of driving "under the influence" or "while impaired" is also usually charged in most states, with a permissive presumption of guilt where the person's blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is .08 percent or greater (units of milligrams per deciliter, representing 8 g of alcohol in 100 deciliters of blood).[3] Some states (e.g., Colorado) include a lesser charge, sometimes referred to as driving while ability impaired (this may apply to individuals with a .05 percent or above, but less than the .08 per se limit for the more serious charge.[3]

Prior to increased emphasis on drinking and driving in the 1980s, standards of .10-.15 percent were in place. The legal limit for commercial drivers in the U.S. is set at 0.04 percent.[3][citation needed] All states also observe a much stricter standard for drivers under the age of 21, commonly of .01-.02; these are often referred to as "Zero Tolerance" laws.[3] The same prohibition applies to any other crewmembers on duty aboard the aircraft (flight attendants, etc.). Some airlines impose additional restrictions, and many pilots also impose stricter standards upon themselves. Commercial pilots found to be in violation of regulations are typically fired or resign voluntarily, and they may lose their pilot certificates and/or be subject to criminal prosecution under Federal or State laws, effectively ending their careers.

 


Contact Information

Telephone
555-0199
FAX
555-0199
Postal address
522 Park Ave, New York, NY 10065
Electronic mail
General Information: info@duilicense
Sales:
Customer Support:
Webmaster: web@duilicense

 

Send mail to someone@microsoft.com with questions or comments about this web site.